Monday, January 7, 2019

2019 Writing Blog

This is a continuation from my 2018 writing blog: https://sungazer127mak.blogspot.com/2018/01/2018-writing-blog.html

December 29th 2019 Annual Summary and Quantum God

I've just about finished "2019 an Astronomer's Year". I have even chosen the cover photo. I'm holding off publication and release of the December video in case there's any clear sky before the end of the month.

With some quiet time over the holiday period, I added more to "The Quantum God". I'm writing a chapter where the story is told by a minor character. Something similar has been done before but I thought it would add a twist, especially as the main character is somewhat imperceptive if the world around him.

December 19th 2019 General Musings

I've written a few bits of the Quantum God and tidied up 2019 An Astronomers Year. However, there were a lot of things happening, like replacing the car and the run-up to Christmas. Naturally, my main priority is to get my annual summary out while it is still current.

There was been some debate in the #WritingCommunity about plans for 2020. Quite honestly, I have no fixed plans because I can never be that sure about what the year will bring. I haven't decided how hard I will try to find full-time employment or an extra day or two to add to my existing part-time work. Quite honestly, much as I like writing, I do not make anywhere near as much from it as my day job. Also, I'm more inclined to drop my projects when paid writing work comes up.

I will be adding some more information to "Being An Astronomer" but that does not necessarily mean that I will bring out a new edition. That is more likely, as/when I have enough new material. The Quantum God will be my main project but I will also write "2020 An Astronomer's Year", as and when the year unwinds.

But there will be no fixed timetable and no promises!

December 4th 2019 An Astronomer's Year

I wrote up my November images and observations and checked the rest of the book. Now I must wait until the end of the year to write the December summary.

November 28th The Quantum God

As often happens, non-writing activities took over but I finally managed to finish the second chapter, using material from the original story and adding a lot of new material.

The third chapter will be entirely new but using an existing character.

November 4th The Quantum God

I have made some progress, mostly by using words from the original story and adapting them. The idea is similar but I am changing several details in the story to make it both more plausible and interesting. I have stuck mostly to that autobiographical flavour of the early part of the story but have changed some events and names to protect both the innocent and the guilty. However, many events, whilst not totally true are ones that are in keeping with the spirit of the original story.

October 31st 2019 An Astronomer's Year

I wrote my update for October 2019. It wasn't a great month but I managed a few good shots.

October 21st The Quantum God

A recurring theme: life had been getting in the way of writing. OK, partially true. I had also thought about doing some updates to my astronomy booklets. OK, excuses! It was quite hard to know exactly where to go with converting a story into a novel. I re-worked the first chapter and added a previously written extract to my multi-preface. I winced at the number of times I had written "really". Many writers had written tweets about overusing words and phrases. Now I kept the ideas for Chapter Two and had an outline of other chapters but could not use the words from the original story, just a few ideas.

Suddenly, the mountain looked much higher but I could see a path up it.

September 8th On the art and science of novel writing


In theory, someone who has written books and magazine articles shouldn't have too much difficulty writing a novel. It isn't as if I haven't tried before! I was planning to self-publish a novel if rejected by a publisher but the feedback from a publisher told me that I could not write a novel. Well perhaps I could but my attempt was deliberately written in a way that would make it stand out from other novels.

My further thoughts are that it was a book but not a novel. Rather like a symphony or concerto, a novel has a structure that all novels follow. Mine did not. Also when people read a novel they expect it to follow this certain structure. Also novels have to have a length of about 120 000 words. Now one could write a story that is longer or shorter but it wouldn't be a novel or would it?

As most of my astronomy books have a lot of illustrations, they do not have that many words. I have debated the concept of daily word counts several times but I now can see why novellists are obsessed with the idea. A thousand words a day means that you can finish a draft in 120 days (about 4 months). A hundred words a day means that it will take over 3 years. Double that for revisions and grammar checks. Would many people consider even starting a project that would take six years to complete?

September 6th

I used some previous material and wrote some new material to craft the first chapter of The Quantum God. It is five prefaces, with little connection between each one. This was just as I'd described in an recent reply to a tweet. My only concern was that it was just short of 4 000 words, so I had about another 96 000 to write. Fortunately, some of it was already written and just needed a bit of adaptation. As I have started and abandoned this project many times, I did not want to feel too optimistic. I did not have any timescale as I thought I had enough years left alive to finish it.

My medium-term plan was also to include some minor revisions to #BeingAnAstronomer and the #PhilsScribblings series.

September 4th

I started to re-visit #TheQuantumGod. Much of it has been crafted from its predecessors. Now it is well- known that most writers abandon most of their projects before completion and only a few get through. Yes, I do have some other aims and if anything comes up that guarantees payment in the short term but, for now, just like my main character, I have a project.

September 2nd

#BeingAnAstronomer is now available to buy: https://www.amazon.com/Being-Astronomer-Second-Philip-Pugh-ebook/dp/B07X94BYD7/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=being+an+astronomer&qid=1567438781&s=digital-text&sr=1-1 #astronomy

September 1st

The 2nd edition of "Being an Astronomer" was not yet available on Kindle. In the meantime, I wrote the August summary of "2019 An Astronomer's Year".

August 30th

I finally released the 2nd edition of "Being an Astronomer" to Kindle. I wasn't 100% happy with the table of contents and some of the pagination but, if you can bear with that, you will find it a handy reference and it contains more photos and information than the first edition. I was not sure whether to jump into my next project or do some updates to some of my booklets first.

August 3rd

I took a break from the 9th draft of "Being an Astronomer" to update "2019 An Astronomer's Year" with my July updates. I also produced the July video with the old classic "Radar Love" by Golden Earring: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhshzz_IWno&t=311s

Here's the full astronomical report: https://sungazer127mak.blogspot.com/2019/07/july-2019.html

July 29th

I finally finished the 8th draft. It made me realise that the first edition was full of holes. There were some comments on Twitter that I was too busy to reply to. Editing your own work is very hard but I don't have any budget to pay an editor and I have years of experience of editing all kinds of documents in the workplace. However, I was rather concerned about finding more issues on each successive draft. A lot of the issues were pagination and updating cross-references but  I could not see an end to the project and had felt 2 drafts from completion since April.

July 22nd

I am finding many more issues on the 8th draft than the 7th. As life away from writing is very busy, I really cannot see an end date at the moment. From my experience with other books, training documents and technical manuals, I know that you just cannot rush this step.

July 8th

I took 25 days to finish the 7th draft of "Being An Astronomer" (2nd edition). I made 23 changes, so I feel like I'm going backwards.

July 1st

Progress on "Being An Astronomer" has been slow. I updated "2019 An Astronomer's Year" with the June entries and updated the Tools and Techniques section.

June 17th

19 pages into the 7th draft and I've found the first error.

June 11th

I managed quite a few hours on "Being An Astronomer" and decided to give it another day before starting the 7th draft.

June 10th

I had a day off, which seemed to disappear in a sea of chores. I DID manage to get round to write the May entry for "2019 An Astronomer's Year", the sequel to 2018 An Astronomer's Year.

I made a small contribution to "Being An Astronomer".

June 2nd

The 6th draft of "Being An Astronomer" is now over 50% complete.I was not at work, so I did a few pages at a time. Editing is so error-prone and I know this from my work as well. I have found enough errors on 6th draft to know that it needs to go to 7th. I'm glad that I have not promised anybody, not even myself, a completion date.

May 29th

After a week or so, I have finally got Microsoft Office back and am back editing Being An Astronomer, 2nd edition.

May 2nd

I did more editing on BeingAnAstronomer and finally finished the 5th draft. On a visit to the kitchen, I put in some outline modifications to my fantasy. I felt the need to write them down, as I would not be able to concentrate on my editing.

May 2nd

As is quite normal, I have not been writing yet today. I have had some chores to do and been engaging on Twitter. Quite honestly, many (including myself - at times!) over-indulge in this. Yet, there is a useful side to this, as I see a lot of ideas. Some I don't agree with but others I think may have some merit.

Many writers are full-time. Many of us aspire to be full-time but, honestly, I have my doubts. It's just like many of us idealise about working from home and avoiding the morning/evening rush. I hate commuting as much as anybody else but I think if one is working or full-time at home (writing, retired, chiuldcare, etc), it becomes very isolating. In my case, despite having been a very social person through my 20s and early 30s, I am socially disconnected. When our daughter was born, we prioritised her over our own needs. Although I don't regret it and neither does my wife, it has left us with no social life. I fear that if I wrote full-time, I would hardly leave the house.

Now, OK as an #astronomy writer who writes and blogs extensively about what I see and photograph from my home, maybe it doesn't matter. However, as I have been known to write fiction and my next major work will be fictional, I hope to do more than just create a fictional reality that is close only to my own and very distant from everyone else's.

So I sometimes wonder how much other writers socialise, especially if they don't have a day job that brings them into contact with people outside their immediate family circle. I interact a lot online, mostly about astronomy and writing but I wonder, at times, whether it actually helps me to understand how other people think.

May 1st

After making more edits to Being an Astronomer on the 5th draft than the 4th, I was feeling rather pessimistic. I updated 2019 An Astronomer's Year with my April summary and finished some proof-reading for the International Meteor Association.

I has a few thoughts for my fantasy novel but did not manage to add to it. Unfortunately, sometimes in life, I concentrate on the important and neglect the urgent. I often think that a day job is a necessity for me, even if it wasn't for the money but I sometimes don't get around to many everyday life chores, like checking the mail. On that note ...

April 28th

I have had to deal with many non-writing activities and worked a full day on Saturday. I have reached the end of the 3rd chapter of the 5th draft of Being an Astronomer. I think checking later drafts is slow and painful but, if you rush it, you either find you need an extra draft or release a poor book.

April 25th

I wanted to detach from Being an Astronomer for a few days. I started my fantasy novel, which is a major rewrite of an abandoned project.

April 24th

I finally finished my 4th draft of Being an Astronomer, 2nd edition. I found enough to suggest that it would go to at least a 6th draft, as I found plenty of corrections. I was also starting to formulate some ideas for my next project.

April 22nd

After getting half-way through the 4th draft, few mistakes had been found. The writer decided, with great reluctance, that the waiting public would have to wait, even though they were almost certainly more tolerant than the pernickety writer!

April 20th

So it came to pass on this day, in a small insignificant town, in an obscure part of a country that had seen better days, that the fourth draft of the iconic "Being An Astronomer" was started. The writer, like his country of birth and residence, had also seen better days. He had the hope, but little expectancy, that this fourth draft would become the finished work. 

April 14th

Progress was slow on the third draft but I was not concerned. This was not a stage of the book to rush. I took seven drafts on the first edition and was hoping to do the second in five. I added a new photo:



April 11th

I had finished the second draft of Being An Astronomer. I did not add any words but added the moon inage from the evening before.



April 8th on daily word counts

One of the problems with Twitter is that sometimes needs more than a few words to give an accurate reply. There has been a lot of controversy about daily word counts and even shaming of people who don't write daily! Now if you find it helps to have a daily word count or write every day, by all means do it. However, in my opinion, it can be less than helpful.

My first thought is this: One word read by a million people is better than a million words read by one person. There are loads of words out there. Many people no longer buy books, newspapers or magazines. They get their information online. If they can get it free, they are less likely to read something that they have to pay for, unless it is very good. I have written loads of words that have never been read, simply because I have pitched them at publishers who have rejected them. Sometimes the feedback has encouraged me to re-work them but, more often than not, their feedback tells me that the project simply won't "fly" and I've got loads of other projects that are potentially more successful.

Secondly, nearly every person is not just a writer, nor do they have servants to do household chores. We may also be sons, daughters, mums, dads, etc. I don't honestly think being a full-time writer to the total exclusion of everything else would make me a healthy person nor would it make me a good writer.

Thirdly, writers do not just write. We revise, edit, spell-check and do a million and one other writing-related activities, All non-fiction writers and a large number of fiction writers research. In my case, I spend a lot of time taking and processing astronomy photos. We also need to promote our work by various means. Even if you have a publisher, they do not promote your book as well as you would like. Also many non-fiction writers do further editions as their subject matters change.

No where word counts are relevant is if you have a publishing contract and a deadline. Most novels are around 120 000 words long and that is what you should aim for. Non-fiction books are not so constrained but need to be around 200 pages to be considered a "good read". You can take today's date, estimate how many words it would take to finish then multiply by two. This will give you time for editing and revision. Even then, this word count is only an average. Some days you may have more time to write and others not so much. On the shorter less-productive days, it may pay to have a rest entirely, or simply read, edit and decide what you need to revise.

For self-published products, I no longer have a fixed date for release. Last year, I shelved my book to write some magazine articles. For one thing, they were bringing in money more quickly. Some projects are time-dependent. It would be daft to publish a yearly summary the following November, so I wanted out as soon after January 1st as I could. As I'm now writing for Kindle, the number of pages I fill is less important than the quality of information.

Some people may choose to have a daily word count as it motivates them. It is OK, as long as you plan in some time for editing and re-writes. My choice is they are neither relevant to myself or my writing.

April 7th

Despite having a busy day with chores, I made good progress with "Being an Astronomer". I am now on the later sections writing about cameras. I am getting near the end of the second draft.

April 6th Daytime

I did a bit of writing in the afternoon and revised by Saturn section. Here are the photos:



April 6th Before Bedtime

I revisited my book just before midnight and added a couple of shots of Jupiter with its moons. I only made minor adjustments to the text.



April 5th, Later

I added a few more Moon photos.




April 5th

I was back on "Being an Astronomer". On Draft 2 of the second edition, I decided to include a map of the moon, just showing the major features.


April 3rd

I took a break from "Being An Astronomer". Last year I wrote 2018 an Astronomer's Year:https://www.amazon.co.uk/2018-Astronomers-Year-Phils-Scribblings-ebook/dp/B07M7PH84H/ref=asap_bc?ie=UTF8

I completed my March entry for this year. It is a summary of the year, including photographs. I am now back to editing "Being An Astronomer".

Apart from my yearly summary, I'm pondering my next project. Do I go back to re-work my novel or write another astronomy booklet?

March 29th

Writers will know what this means! Today I reached a key milestone in writing the second edition of "Being An Astronomer". I have finished my first draft and "completed" all content. Naturally, I will find something that just cannot wait for a 3rd edition but it is unlikely that I will add any new sections.

Unlike fiction writers, most of the new content I am likely to add is related to photos and diagrams drawn from photographs. I then need to make sure that all new sections are correctly cross-referenced from the older ones.

The main feature of the second edition is that the first edition was written soley with astronomers with an internet connection and the second edition includes a lot of information that may be difficult to obtain without the use of an internet or a public library.

March 27th

I had not added many words but had some successful and some less successful photo sessions, primarily aimed at obtaining pictures for Being an Astronomer. One of the most notable was my picture showing Regulus (the brightest star in Leo) as a double star.



March 23rd

I finished the first draft of my Constellations chapter and started on solar system data. Best of all, I showed that the Sun is in a totally different place from the "signs of the zodiac" as shown in newspapers!

Constellation
Dates (approx.)
Sagittarius
December 15th to January 21st
Capricornus
January 22nd to February 15th
Aquarius
February 15th to March 12th
Pisces
March 12th to April 20th
Aries
April 20th to May 13th
Taurus
May 13th to June 21st
Gemini
June 21st to July 20th
Cancer
July 20th to August 11th
Leo
August 11th to September 17th
Virgo
September 18th to November 2nd
Libra
November 2nd to November 26th
Scorpius
November 26th to November 29th
Ophiuchus
November 29th to December 15th

March 22nd


I added a section on Ursa Minor.

March 21st

I was at home with a stomach bug but otherwise felt fine. My day job involves a lot of driving and visiting people in their homes. I completed my section on Aquila and included some of the surrounding features, such as Delphinus.


I've now finished Cygnus, which contains the beautiful double star Albireo.


I dug out an old photo of Grus from a photo I took from Aruba. Unfortunately, my Chapter 8 is very northern hemisphere biased because that's where I do most of my observations and photography from.

I finished off with Scorpius.


March 20th

Again, it was a busy day but managed to complete my section on Taurus. I also completed Perseus.

I finished with Lyra and included a diagram of how to find the elusive M56.



March 17th

Although it was my day off from the day jobs, I got bogged down in non-writing activities. However, I added a lot more substance to my section on Orion. Here's the annotated photo:


March 16th

I didn't do a lot of writing today but drew two small diagrams showing the relative sizes and positions of the galaxies in Leo. I don't have the right equipment to photograph them but, if I did, it would negate the idea that Being An Astronomer is a beginner book. I have seen the galaxies but each of them look like small, fuzzy patches of light where a galaxy is supposed to be.

I also re-arranged my constellations chapter into alphabetical order and realised that I need to write a lot more detail on each constellation.

Overall, I'm thinking that my book will have several editions and I will probably release the second in summer or autumn. 

March 15th

I used a recent photo of Leo and annotated it with the bright stars and the positions of galaxies. Hard work but well worth it.



March  7th

Sometimes I wonder if I have bitten off more than I can chew! I'm writing the second edition of "Being an Astronomer" (https://www.amazon.co.uk/Being-Astronomer-Philip-Pugh-ebook/dp/B07DMQVD15/ref=asap_bc?ie=UTF8). My plan is to write some detailed descriptions of constellations. I am including real photos, instead of the usual line drawings and adding some descriptions and photos of deep sky objects.

I am not planning to include all constellations, just a selection.

February 11th


I revised the solar section but did not change many words.I added a lot of photos instead.

February 6th

I revisited the planetary section of "Being an Astronomer" and added a few newer photos and tweaked a few details. The next section is about the Sun.

I also read a lot of discussion about being a writer. There are many writers and there are almost as many types of writer as there are writers. Most of us never get published and the overwhelming majority of those that do cannot make a full-time living from it. Some writers have fixed ideas about how many words they should write and/or how many hours they should spend a day. That may be fine for full-time writers who would probably spend all day most days procrastinating. At the time of writing, I had two day jobs and some days were too busy to even think of writing.

Many writers tend to blog about writing and some are active on social platforms. Some of this time is valuably spent. Networking with other authors about how to go about work is fine but you can overdo it and it can become another excuse not to get on with the business of writing. Time spent promoting yourself or your publications is time well-spent, especially if you find out which media channels generate your most purchases. Also, time spent looking at your genre or intended genre of other ideas is not wasted. There is little point in competing in already-crowded space, unless you really are able to offer something unique.

As my writing time (like everybody else's) is limited, I like to make sure I am not wasting too much. Before launching a lengthy project, I like to have some idea of whether people will actually read the end product. In addition, as well as writing, there is editing, re-writing some sections, researching (especially in my genre of specialist interest) and images. This probably takes 2 to 3 times more time than first drafting.

This (to my mind) rather makes judging productivity by numbers of words rather meaningless.

February 1st

I haven't spent much time writing but am making steady progress on the second edition of "Being an Astronomer": https://www.amazon.com/Being-Astronomer-Philip-Pugh-ebook/dp/B07DMQVD15/ref=sr_1_12?ie=UTF8&qid=1549031897&sr=8-12&keywords=philip+pugh

I have corrected some minor errors, added some clarifications and replaced/added more photographs.

January 31st

I'm starting on my 2019 report, which will be finished when the year is over. January was a more active month than past Januarys, despite missing the lunar eclipse.


January 27th/28th

Although my photo session failed to produce any images that I could use. I made a good start on the second edition of "Being An Astronomer".

January 26th

Well, I have my roadmap sort of sorted-out. Any activities that make money outside of writing will naturally take priority, unless I really get in the Amazon Top 100. Actually, "2018 an Astronomer's Year" has reached the dizzy heights of 12 512: 

https://authorcentral.amazon.com/gp/books/book-detail-page?ie=UTF8&bookASIN=B07M7PH84H&index=default

Most writers, apart from J.K.Rowling, William Shakespeare and the like will be rather impressed by that.

I'm not planning on anything completely new for 2019. I'm going to at least start the 2nd edition of "Being an Astronomer". The main change will be a lot more illustrations of constellations. Naturally, I'll also add any new photos to other sections. Apart from the usual reasons for delay, it depends on the British weather, which has delayed previous projects.

The other plan is not quite new. The original idea is about 6 years old. I revisited it last year but lots of things (including paid magazine work) pushed it to the back burner. The current working title is "The Quantum God". See last year's blog for details.

January 23rd

I finally finished my Webcamming booklet, which I had postponed to keep my previous booklet current:

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Webcamming-Phils-Scribblings-Philip-Pugh-ebook/dp/B07N2Z7MYT/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1548450772&sr=1-1&keywords=webcamming+philip+pugh

So, an interesting challenge! I have several project ideas but not sure which one to go with. Nothing in the pipeline.

January 15th

"2018 an Astronomer's Year" has finally hit the bookshelf: 


January 7th

As it was my day off, I made good progress with my 2018 retrospective and have called it "2018 an Astronomer's Year". I was going to do a similar one on 2001 but didn't get many results. I'm glad I waited, as it would have made some rather dry reading without my photographs. I had a couple of sections to finish, then the final refining and checking.

January 1st

I started the year with just two projects on the go and both were part of the Phil's Scribblings series of articles and booklets. I had started writing "Webcamming" but decided to include some step-by-step instructions, so I had shelved it for the time being, due to weather.

Being the end of the year, I wanted to finish my retrospective but wanted to consider a new, catchy title. Unlike previous end-of-year reports, I decided to include an outline of how I achieved what I did, to make it more interesting for the readers.

Wednesday, January 2, 2019

January 2019

January 30th 2045 GMT

I went out again and made sure that my aim was better. I caught many different angles and parts of Perseus, hoping that I could get the whole constellation with the set-up. Well, sooner or later.

It seemed more like later, as I only caught the top half of the constellation.


I managed an image of Melotte 20, though from it,



January 30th 2010 GMT

Further experimentation and investigation showed that the fault in my set-up was the intervalometer and not the camera. I manually set the exposure to 15 seconds and took intermittent frames using a rote shutter release. ISO was 6400 and focal length was 35mm.

Unfortunately, my aim was out again, as I just caught the top of Perseus and caught just the top of the constellation, featuring Melotte 20 again.

January 30th 1230 GMT

The Sun was diving in and out of clouds but I tried a solar hydrogen alpha shot regardless.




January 28th 1010 GMT

I had some unexpected clear sky, so did a solar hydrogen alpha shoot. The Sun, however, was quiet.




January 28th 0015 GMT

I moved the camera towards Cancer, more in hope than expectation. I did not catch the whole constellation but caught a widefield shot of the Beehive (M44).




January 27th 2100 GMT

Well it was clear but I was having trouble with my intervalometer. I ended up taking a few manual shots every few minutes instead. It was the usual setting for my camera with the new lens. It was at 35mm focal length, ISO 6400 and 15 seconds exposure. I started off at Perseus and let the eastern stars drift across. I didn't get anything useable for publication but caught the star cluster Melotte 20 with Capella and parts of Auriga.



January 27th 1330 GMT

There were some more clear patches, so I did a solar hydrogen alpha shoot with my PST. This time, I increased the zoom on my DSLR. I had reverted back to my 70-300mm lens and 32mm Plossl. Even though I could not see any detail visually, I caught a sunspot and some albedo features on camera.


January 27th 1225 GMT


Normally, I would just be going to the shops for a few things. I'm rather good at procrastinating on my days off work and had loads of things that needed doing. However, I had been following some sunspots on the Big Bear and Learmonth solar observatories and there was some clear sun in between moving clouds. I could not recall the last time I had attempted to observe the Sun in white light. It had been unusually quiet throughout 2018. I was surprised to see two small sunspots near the solar limb before clouds rolled in again.


January 25th 2210 GMT


I was still coughing, so I left a camera trap at the southern half of Orion, with the objective of doing a stitch. I set my camera at 35mm focal length. ISO 6400 and 15 seconds exposure. I didn't get any more images but I didn't need a stitch, as I caught the whole constellation.



January 22nd 2120 GMT


I still had my cold and it was sub-zero, so I snapped the Moon from an open window upstairs, with the same settings as the morning.

Unfortunately, the photos were under-exposed and I was unable to extract much detail.

January 22nd 0730 GMT


The Moon was just past full and low in the west. I took some shots at 300mm focal length, ISO 100 and 1/1000 second exposure. It was rather nice for a DSLR-only shot.




January 21st 0350 GMT

In the run-up to the lunar eclipse, clouds of various thicknesses were moving over it. Sometimes it stayed cloud-free for a few seconds but never quite long enough to take a photo. By 0200 GMT, it had clouded over completely. I woke up in the night to see a partial phase of about 60% but, again, it did not stay cloud-free long enough. Although I woke up twice during totality, it was 100% clouded out.

January 17th 1240 GMT


It was clear but even the professional solar observatories were showing a quiet sun. I decided to experiment by using a short focal length eyepiece and my new camera lens. It was harder than I thought. I set my camera focal length to 35mm and, after a lot of trial with my Moonfish 15mm focal length eyepiece, finally settled on my Moonfish 20mm eyepiece. As the professional observatories suggested, I had a very quiet Sun.

My first effort at processing was a disaster but I found that my leaving the red channel and using Curves on the green, the result was not too bad.




January 16th 2040 GMT

Conditions were similar to the evening before, with lots of moving cloud of various thicknesses. I did my usual routine with the Moon and my DSLR. If anything, this was a shade better than the night before.


January 15th 2115 GMT

There was a temporary gap in the clouds. I was not able to get a telescope onto the Moon, as cloud was encroaching again. I took some shots with my DSLR using various exposure times at ISO 100 and 300mm focal length. Even though I write it myself, I think it was rather nice for a DSLR.


January 13th 2340 GMT


There were some clear patches in the sky, with some moving cloud. I left my camera out in “constellation mode”: 35mm focal length, ISO 6400 and 15 seconds’ exposure. I aimed it at Cancer and left it to do its work. Cloud ruined most frames but I managed to catch the constellation and I was pleasantly surprised how well the Beehive Cluster (M44) turned out.



I caught the Sickle asterism of Leo in another set of frames.




January 9th 1820 GMT


The Moon was a thin crescent phase low in the west. I took some shots at 1/250 second exposure 300mm focal length and ISO 100. I tried a few snaps at 1/25 second to see if I could capture earthshine. I didn't but the crescent was OK.




Straight after it was back to the previous night’s settings, as I aimed my camera at the west side of Taurus. This was a stack of the first 50 frames.


This was a stack of the second batch of 50 frames.


I moved the camera after the third batch, so stacked 26 frames.


The rest of the photos were ruined by cloud, so I stacked the three above,


January 9th 1040 GMT

I checked the Sun with my PST and DSLR. Visually, the Sun had an all-too-familiar feel of being bland and featureless, at least through the eyepiece. However, the photographic result was more illuminating.


January 8th 2140 GMT

After a bit of teasing, a clear patch of sky opened up in the south. I set my DSLR at 35mm focal length, ISO 6400 and 15 seconds exposure and aimed it at Taurus. I had 48 frames that were unaffected by cloud so stacked them using DSS and finished off in GIMP.


January 7th 0720 GMT



As I was getting ready to leave for work, I saw Venus in the morning sky. I checked it with my binoculars and the phase seemed to be about 60%.

January 4th 1800 GMT


After a partially clear day, where the clouds seemed to be gravitationally bound to the Sun, it was a bit more clear in the evening. As I still had a cold, I left my camera searching for Quadrantid meteors while I stayed inside. I set up my camera to 35mm focal length, ISO 6400 and 15 seconds’ exposure.

No luck with meteors but I processed a few frames to obtain a snap of the polar regions.




January 1st 1950 GMT


After yet another cloudy day, it unexpectedly cleared. I used my new lens at 35mm with a 0.45x focal reducer to catch meteors (or at least try!). I used an effective focal length of 15.75mm, 15 seconds exposure and an ISO of 6400. I aimed the camera in the rough direction of M81 to try and catch some Quadrantids. I did not stay out, as I still had a cold.

I left the camera out for almost 2.5 hours but most frames were ruined by some cloud. I stacked 24 of the best frames to get a not bad effort of Ursa Minor.


I caught a satellite trail.